Finance

The 1% Club: In These States, a $743,000 Income Isn't Enough to Join

2026-02-27 11:05
526 views
The 1% Club: In These States, a $743,000 Income Isn't Enough to Join

Being a top earner is relative: Why trading a high-tax zip code for a low-cost state is the ultimate retirement power move.

  1. Home
  2. Retirement
  3. Retirement Plans
The 1% Club: In These States, a $743,000 Income Isn't Enough to Join

Being a top earner is relative: Why trading a high-tax zip code for a low-cost state is the ultimate retirement power move.

Adam Shell's avatar By Adam Shell published 27 February 2026 in Features

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.

  • Copy link
  • Facebook
  • X
Share this article Print Join the conversation Follow us Add us as a preferred source on Google Newsletter Get the Kiplinger Newsletter

Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more. Delivered daily. Enter your email in the box and click Sign Me Up.

Contact me with news and offers from other Future brands Receive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners or sponsors By submitting your information you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy and are aged 16 or over.

You are now subscribed

Your newsletter sign-up was successful

Want to add more newsletters?

Kiplinger Today

Delivered daily

Kiplinger Today

Profit and prosper with the best of Kiplinger's advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and much more delivered daily. Smart money moves start here.

Signup + Kiplinger A Step Ahead

Sent five days a week

Kiplinger A Step Ahead

Get practical help to make better financial decisions in your everyday life, from spending to savings on top deals.

Signup + Kiplinger Closing Bell

Delivered daily

Kiplinger Closing Bell

Get today's biggest financial and investing headlines delivered to your inbox every day the U.S. stock market is open.

Signup + Kiplinger Adviser Intel

Sent twice a week

Kiplinger Adviser Intel

Financial pros across the country share best practices and fresh tactics to preserve and grow your wealth.

Signup + Kiplinger Tax Tips

Delivered weekly

Kiplinger Tax Tips

Trim your federal and state tax bills with practical tax-planning and tax-cutting strategies.

Signup + Kiplinger Retirement Tips

Sent twice a week

Kiplinger Retirement Tips

Your twice-a-week guide to planning and enjoying a financially secure and richly rewarding retirement

Signup + Kiplinger Adviser Angle

Sent bimonthly.

Kiplinger Adviser Angle

Insights for advisers, wealth managers and other financial professionals.

Signup + Kiplinger Investing Weekly

Sent twice a week

Kiplinger Investing Weekly

Your twice-a-week roundup of promising stocks, funds, companies and industries you should consider, ones you should avoid, and why.

Signup + Kiplinger Invest for Retirement

Sent weekly for six weeks

Kiplinger Invest for Retirement

Your step-by-step six-part series on how to invest for retirement, from devising a successful strategy to exactly which investments to choose.

Signup + An account already exists for this email address, please log in. Subscribe to our newsletter

A mother and son walk barefoot in their garden with a white pony. Their Italianate mansion is in the background.

(Image credit: Getty Images)

Being in the top 1% of earners doesn't necessarily mean you're rich or that your odds of a secure retirement are 100%. That's especially true if you live in California or Washington, D.C., where pricey real estate and a high cost of living can take a big bite out of your budget.

It's not just what you earn, but where you live, that determines whether you're truly rich or just doing okay. In fact, being "rich" in the United States is shaped as much by geography as it is income, according to a BestBrokers analysis that quantifies the income needed to join the elite 1% club in each state.

Where you live in your peak earning years and where you live in retirement impacts retirement readiness.

From just $107.88 $24.99 for Kiplinger Personal Finance

Become a smarter, better informed investor. Subscribe from just $107.88 $24.99, plus get up to 4 Special Issues

CLICK FOR FREE ISSUE https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/y99mlvgqmn1763972420.png

Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters

Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more - straight to your e-mail.

Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice - straight to your e-mail.

Sign up

Income vs location

"Famously originating in real estate, the mantra ‘location, location, location’ is also valid in wealth and personal finance," said Paul Hoffman, an analyst at data firm BestBrokers. "Where you live can add or shave hundreds of thousands of dollars off what it takes to be in the top 1%."

At the national level, Americans need an annual income of at least $742,957 to break into the 1% club, according to BestBrokers. In 2026, more than 1.5 million U.S. households earn enough to be among the richest 1% of Americans.

Income thresholds to make the cut, however, differ by state. It takes a minimum income of $1.09 million, for example, to be among the top 1% earners in Washington, D.C. (See the income needed be a 1% earner in each state in the table below.) You’ll need annual earnings of $1.07 million in Connecticut and $980,298 in Massachusetts.

On the other hand, an annual income of $500,000 or less is enough to break into the top 1% in West Virginia, Mississippi, and New Mexico. In fact, the top 1% incomes in 38 states fall short of the national average.

How far a dollar goes in one state versus another often hinges on the cost of real estate. In some parts of the U.S., a salary that signals extreme affluence barely buys entry into the top tier elsewhere, says Hoffman. The cost of living also tends to be higher in states where the median home price is much higher than in cheaper areas.

Sure, it's great that one-percenters in Washington, D.C., earn nearly $1.1 million. But it costs an arm and a leg for a median-priced home — $1.25 million to be exact, compared to the national median home price of $446,000, according to Redfin data. Similarly, Californians in the 1% earn nearly $920,000 annually, but the median home price in the nation's most populous state is $818,000.

On the flip side, 1% earners in lower-cost West Virginia earn nearly $423,000 but benefit from much more affordable housing. The median home price there is $245,000.

Swipe to scroll horizontallyAnnual "1% club" income and median home price by state

State

Income to make top 1%

Median home price (December 2025)

Washington, D.C.

$1,090,935

$1,250,000

Connecticut

$1,073,564

$482,000

Massachusetts

$980,298

$652,000

California

$919,587

$818,000

New Jersey

$915,205

$561,000

New York

$905,617

$501,000

Florida

$872,852

$440,000

Washington

$831,939

$628,000

Colorado

$785,105

$633,000

Wyoming

$783,459

$441,000

Texas

$755,616

$344,000

New Hampshire

$746,900

$515,000

Illinois

$742,663

$296,000

Nevada

$714,743

$498,000

Virginia

$712,793

$469,000

N. Dakota

$706,664

$297,000

Utah

$701,372

$662,000

S. Dakota

$697,962

$325,000

Maryland

$688,163

$509,000

Minnesota

$681,932

$373,000

Georgia

$673,211

$379,000

Montana

$667,125

$515,000

Pennsylvania

$665,913

$327,000

Arizona

$651,314

$463,000

N. Carolina

$650,826

$401,000

Tennessee

$648,304

$412,000

Idaho

$637,680

$474,000

Kansas

$619,506

$293,000

Nebraska

$613,364

$293,000

Rhode Island

$612,616

$515,000

Oregon

$612,458

$511,000

Alaska

$595,571

$425,000

Vermont

$592,706

$431,000

S. Carolina

$589,701

$399,000

Delaware

$587,649

$404,000

Wisconsin

$575,594

$328,000

Michigan

$570,384

$271,000

Hawaii

$569,942

$961,000

Missouri

$567,805

$282,000

Iowa

$562,730

$241,000

Louisiana

$559,764

$254,000

Maine

$559,572

$381,000

Ohio

$559,356

$261,000

Oklahoma

$553,216

$257,000

Alabama

$540,949

$284,000

Indiana

$539,660

$270,000

Arkansas

$525,876

$269,000

Kentucky

$504,059

$278,000

New Mexico

$458,718

$364,000

Mississippi

$446,367

$267,000

West Virginia

$422,835

$245,000

Source: BestBrokers, Yahoo Finance and Redfin monthly housing market data.

For more context on state affordability, read our article on how all 50 states tax retirees.

"Expensive real estate isn't really a cost. It's ultimately a retirement fund. It's a form of forced savings." — David Schneider

The benefits of owning a pricy home

Still, there can be value in owning expensive real estate with high appreciation potential during your peak earning years, argues David Schneider, a certified financial planner and president of Schneider Wealth Strategies.

"Expensive real estate isn't really a cost," says Schneider. “It's ultimately a retirement fund. It's a form of forced savings. And with any luck, somebody who retires might be able to sell that $3 million apartment in New York City and buy a $1.5 million house in a moderate cost area. And all that extra liquidity goes toward their retirement."

How downsizing your home can upside your retirement  

Trading down to a cheaper home in less-expensive parts of the nation can be a viable strategy to turn not-so-solid retirement odds into a slam dunk for retirement readiness. It's the real estate version of a winning stock trade: sell high and buy low. Selling a high-priced home in an expensive area and downsizing in a lower-cost locale can reap big dividends. The strategy allows a retiree to free up sizable home equity and cash flow, thereby improving their financial position in their golden years.

Let's say you spent most of your career living in California and sell a median priced home for $818,00. You move to New Mexico and buy a median priced home for $364,000. The numbers work on this real estate trade. You'll be able to buy your new home in cash and still have roughly $450,000 (minus real estate commissions and moving expenses) left over to pad your nest egg.

Using a home with a lot of equity built up as a retirement asset can be a win-win, especially for people who can find a new home in a different state that delivers the type of lifestyle they covet and offers good health care.

"Geography (or moving to a state with lower housing costs) is a meaningful lever to pull when it's used wisely," said Schneider. "It can turn a comfortable retirement into a wow retirement. Moving can also turn a marginal retirement situation into a truly secure one." On the flip side, if you live in a low-cost state during your major earning years, a move to a more expensive area due to a job relocation or to be closer to kids and grandkids could prove costly, Schneider adds.

Should you stay in a high-cost state, or should you go?

It's not news that most Americans feel that they're behind on their retirement savings. Even though retiring comfortably is a common goal for many workers, most people don't have confidence that they'll be able to do so. About three in five American workers (58%) say their retirement account balances are behind where they should be, according to Bankrate's 2025 Retirement Savings Survey.

From a purely financial standpoint, if you live in an expensive state, but you have ample retirement savings, and your home is paid off or your mortgage is manageable, and you can easily meet your monthly bills, retiring in place is fine.

However, the decision becomes more complicated if you live in an expensive part of the country, making it harder to fund your lifestyle as you enter retirement. The high costs of housing, taxes, and daily expenditures can take a big bite out of even a seven-figure salary.

That's where the so-called geographical arbitrage comes into play.

In lower cost states, even a much lower top-tier 1% income "can stretch significantly further, translating into large homes, lower taxes, and greater disposable income," notes Hoffman of BestBrokers. “In real terms, top 1% status can feel very different depending on the local price tag.”

One-percenters living in high-cost states, for example, could see their savings depleted more quickly and have more of their money tied up in real estate. In contrast, living in lower-cost states means retirement savings will last longer and cash flow will be higher.

No matter where a one percenter lives, the key personal finance concept to keep in mind is this: "It's not how much you make, it's how much you keep," says Daniel Milan, managing director and investment adviser at Cornerstone Financial Services.

Since the Covid crisis, Milan says more clients are weighing the financial benefits of relocating and downsizing as a retirement savings strategy. "The discussion is no longer just about weather and the snowbird phenomenon," says Milan, whose firm is based in Michigan, a state known for its harsh winters. "Nowadays, the discussion has become an analysis of the financial impact of moving to a tax-free or lower-tax state, or to a place with lower housing costs and a more affordable cost of living. The analysis is more about retirement viability, longevity, and the risk of running out of money."

Milan says a client recently came in to discuss the financial ramifications of selling their Michigan home and buying a condo in Florida. The long-term savings were substantial, Milan says. Freeing up hundreds of thousands of dollars and allocating that to their retirement account amounts to a game changer. "Over a 10 to 20-year retirement, it makes a significant difference from a stress test or risk standpoint in regards to their cash flow and retirement fund account balance," says Milan.

When it comes to a retirement nest egg, real estate equity (e.g., the difference between the market value of the home and any outstanding mortgage balance) must be factored into the equation, adds Milan.

"Even if an individual or family doesn't realize it, the appreciation of real estate plays a part in retirement viability and readiness," says Milan.

The key question to ask is: will downsizing result in a big enough cash flow benefit to make the move worthwhile.

"Can you minimize and mitigate that retirement cash flow risk and savings gap?" says Milan. "You want to really move the needle. It's about reducing risk and increasing the odds of success for a secure retirement."

Get expert retirement strategies and lifestyle insights delivered to your inbox. Subscribe to our free newsletter, Retirement Tips.

Read More

  • Best Places to Retire in the US
  • 5 Charming Small Towns Where America's Wealthy Retire
  • Cheapest Places to Retire in the US
  • 15 Cheapest Small Towns to Live In
Get Kiplinger Today newsletter — freeContact me with news and offers from other Future brandsReceive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners or sponsorsBy submitting your information you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy and are aged 16 or over. Adam ShellAdam ShellContributing Writer

Adam Shell is a veteran financial journalist who covers retirement, personal finance, financial markets, and Wall Street. He has written for USA Today, Investor's Business Daily and other publications.

Latest