Dave Ramsey Tells Wisconsin Couple Their Advisor Sold Them Outdated Tax Strategy

Quick Read

• A financial advisor recommended a $260,000 HELOC against a paid-off home for tax deductions despite the strategy’s limited value after 2017 tax changes.

• The couple carries $150,000 in debt while contributing $50,000 annually to retirement instead of eliminating guaranteed costs first.

• If you’re thinking about retiring or know someone who is, there are three quick questions causing many Americans to realize they can retire earlier than expected. take 5 minutes to learn more here

Tax deductions sound appealing until you realize you're spending a dollar to save 25 cents. Borrowing against your home to create tax write-offs is an outdated strategy that ignores a fundamental truth: debt costs more than most tax savings are worth.

On a November 21 episode of The Dave Ramsey Show, a caller named Sam from Wisconsin explained that his financial advisor recommended taking out a $260,000 HELOC against his paid-off home for tax write-off purposes. Sam and his wife, both 45, have $1.6 million in their 401(k)s, contribute $50,000 annually to retirement, and bring in $225,000 per year. They're also paying off $150,000 in debt, including a $50,000 student loan.

Ramsey rejected the advisor's strategy outright. "Your financial advisor is selling you a load of crap," Ramsey said. The tax deduction for mortgage interest was severely limited by the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, and even when it applies, the math rarely justifies the risk. Sam would pay thousands in interest annually to potentially save a fraction of that on taxes.

"You don't borrow money for a tax deduction,"

Ramsey said. He told Sam to ignore the HELOC advice, focus on eliminating their $150,000 in debt, and consider finding a new advisor who isn't stuck in pre-2017 tax code.

The Tax Tail Wagging the Dog

This advisor's HELOC recommendation represents a dangerous inversion of financial priorities. Tax strategies should optimize existing financial decisions, not create them. Borrowing $260,000 to generate interest deductions means paying real money to save theoretical dollars, and the math rarely works even for those who can still itemize deductions.

The couple's situation reveals another issue: they're contributing $50,000 annually to retirement while carrying $150,000 in consumer debt. That student loan and other obligations represent guaranteed costs, while the retirement contributions offer uncertain future returns. The emotional appeal of tax optimization often distracts from simpler wealth-building strategies. Sam's advisor may be technically knowledgeable about outdated tax code, but he's missing the forest for the trees. Financial products should serve your goals, not create unnecessary complexity that benefits the advisor more than the client.

The New Report Shaking Up Retirement Plans 

You may think retirement is about picking the best stocks or ETFs, but you’d be wrong. See even great investments can be a liability in retirement. The difference comes down to a simple: accumulation vs distribution. The difference is causing millions to rethink their plans.

The good news? After answering three quick questions many Americans are finding they can retire earlier than expected. If you’re thinking about retiring or know someone who is, take 5 minutes to learn more here.